<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in a Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/</link>
	<description>Driving Oracle Innovation</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OraNA :: Oracle News Aggregator &#187; What’s in a Name?</title>
		<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>OraNA :: Oracle News Aggregator &#187; What’s in a Name?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-612</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] RSS feed for comments on this post. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] RSS feed for comments on this post. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Enterprise-enterprise still involve people and are therefore social. That may not get you all the way there, but it's a start.

There is no Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 or 3.0, it's all the same principles applied to different relationships.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise-enterprise still involve people and are therefore social. That may not get you all the way there, but it&#8217;s a start.</p>
<p>There is no Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 or 3.0, it&#8217;s all the same principles applied to different relationships.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hunt</title>
		<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I think what we were talking about was something that evolves from Web 2.0. So far social systems extend only to person-to-person relationships. We were asking, what happens when you have enterprise-to-enterprise relationships? 

Is this a better way to express trust between organizations? Is it more powerful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what we were talking about was something that evolves from Web 2.0. So far social systems extend only to person-to-person relationships. We were asking, what happens when you have enterprise-to-enterprise relationships? </p>
<p>Is this a better way to express trust between organizations? Is it more powerful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>The apps include the platform b/c without the apps, what utility does the platform have? You can't divorce the two yet. This is like the old hardware vs. software debate. Who won? All the platforms (think social networks) out there need to drive users to them. Beyond the vanilla experience, what do they have to attract people?

IMHO, the relationship is symbiotic, for now. As platforms become commodities, the killer apps will reign supreme.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apps include the platform b/c without the apps, what utility does the platform have? You can&#8217;t divorce the two yet. This is like the old hardware vs. software debate. Who won? All the platforms (think social networks) out there need to drive users to them. Beyond the vanilla experience, what do they have to attract people?</p>
<p>IMHO, the relationship is symbiotic, for now. As platforms become commodities, the killer apps will reign supreme.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius</title>
		<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>The game will be played at the platform level. The one that controls the platform controls the apps. I believe that social apps will show the way, but we need to stay focused and learn to build a successful platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game will be played at the platform level. The one that controls the platform controls the apps. I believe that social apps will show the way, but we need to stay focused and learn to build a successful platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fusion ECM: Enterprise Content Management From The Product Pit</title>
		<link>http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Fusion ECM: Enterprise Content Management From The Product Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oracleappslab.com/2007/09/18/whats-in-a-name/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Social Apps&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Social Apps<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
